|
|
|
||||
|
Taking on the Big Boys George Davidson As you may or may not know, a small group of on-line
hamsters each week attempt to predict the outcome of all the NFL games
that weekend. Now some weeks ‘a dogs dinner’ could be accurately
used to describe our efforts in the crystal ball department and other
weeks Gypsy Rose Lee has nothing on us (but enough of JR’s dress
sense!). Theoretically, basing your picks on flipping a coin should give
you a 50% success rate. It’s an either/or situation (lets ignore draws
as they are pretty rare) and you are either right or wrong. None of the
games are dependant on one another so each game stands on it’s own. As
I said par for this course is 50% - above and that’s your skill, luck
and/or tarot cards in action. Below 50% … well, need I say more? Well for my control group of professionals, I have been tracking the sports staff of a daily rag you might be familiar with …. So it is without further ado. For your entertainment and edification that I give you the match-up of the century. A rather elderly and arthritic UK David verses a mighty (and shockingly well paid) American Goliath. Its….. BARRY SWITZER ATE MY HAMSTER TOO Much respected DMN columnists such as Kevin
Blackistone and Jean-Jacques Taylor’s predictions have been tallied
along with some of their colleagues to compare against some of the
regular scruff of the BSAMH2. So after that huge build up, here are the
teams and their scores to date…. |
|||||
|
Dallas Morning News Roster Jean Jacque-Taylor Average |
133 (67.2%) 124 (62.6%) 124 (62.6%) 119 (60.1%) 118 (59.6%) 110 (55.6%) 108 (54.5%) 119 (60.3%) |
BSAMH2 Select Seven
Nick Bowler |
139 (70.2%) 138 (69.7%) 134 (67.7%) 133 (67.2%) 132 (66.7%) 130 (65.7%) 130 (65.7%) 133 (67.2%) |
||
|
WHAT!? Now you might consider it unfair for us to play our best seven against the entire DMN roster so check out this stat. If you tally ALL 11 of the hamster’s scores and average them you get 129.3 (65.3%). That’s still a full 5% (10 games) better than the DMN average. So on that basis we still kick DMN ass. Now you can prove damn near anything with statistics (i.e. 72.3% of all statistics are made up) but this is comparing like with like under identical environments. With the Internet, we have access to the same information, stats and analysis as the pros. The only difference is that they get paid to do this and write articles for their publication and we do it for the ’love’ of the game. It just seems we can do it better. What does the above mean in the great scheme of things? Not a damn thing I’m afraid … unless we can get the hang of betting against the spread! Manage that and for a ‘modest’ investment at the local bookies, the next Hamster Huddle could be coming from Jerry’s Box with the man himself delivering the beer, nachos & chilli cheese dogs to our comfy chairs.
|
|||||